Software licensing is an important aspect of the software development industry. It’s a way for developers to protect their intellectual property and make money from their work. One of the popular pricing models in software licensing is per user per month pricing, which is becoming increasingly popular among developers.
Per user per month licensing means that customers are charged a fee for each user who uses the software. This fee is charged every month and gives customers access to the latest version of the software and ongoing support. Microsoft Office is an excellent example of per user per month licensing, charging $20 per user per month for access to its suite of productivity software.
The traditional model of software licensing involved buying a perpetual license for the software, which allowed the customer to use the software indefinitely. However, this often required a large upfront payment. For instance, Microsoft Office 2019 costs $300 for a single perpetual license that can be used for up to 3 years. While this may seem like a better deal upfront, there are several reasons why per user per month licensing a better option for development is.
Firstly, per user per month licensing allows developers to have a consistent revenue stream. With the perpetual license model, developers would receive a large payment upfront, but they would not receive any additional revenue unless the customer upgraded to an updated version. With per user per month licensing, developers can generate a steady revenue stream and invest in the continued development and support of the software.
Secondly, per user per month licensing allows developers to offer a more flexible and accessible pricing model for their customers. Customers don’t have to make a large upfront payment to access the latest version of the software. Instead, they can pay a smaller monthly fee and have access to the software on a continuous basis. This pricing model is particularly attractive to businesses that may not have the capital to make a large upfront payment but still need access to the software.
Lastly, per user per month licensing allows developers to provide better support and maintenance for their software. With the traditional perpetual license model, developers may not have the resources to provide ongoing support and maintenance for their software. With per user per month licensing, developers can allocate resources to provide ongoing support and maintenance for the software, ensuring that customers have access to the latest updates and features.
In conclusion, per user per month licensing is a great option for software development. It provides a consistent revenue stream for developers, a flexible and accessible pricing model for customers, and allows for better support and maintenance of the software. Using Microsoft Office as an example, paying $20 per user per month for access to the latest version of the software is a much better option than paying $300 every 3 years for a perpetual license.
Comments are closed